"For the persons here mentioned to be brought before the judgment seat, is a proof that they must have been responsible to God, in some way or other, by a knowledge of his law; because only those who are under his law are to be judged by it, and they who are 'without law shall perish without law'" (JJ. Andrew, The Ambassador, 1867, p. 234).
“Resurrection of two classes. It is contended by many that the resurrection at the second advent comprises only one class – the righteous; but we think the scripture testimony already produced is quite sufficient to disprove this theory… A parallel passage to this is to be found in John v, 28, where we read that Jesus said ‘Marvel not at this; for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the grave shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good unto the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil unto the resurrection of damnation.’ The ‘all’ here mentioned, are of course, not all mankind, but only that portion amenable to judgment – those who have become responsible to God by a knowledge of his law or truth. Some of them will have been sufficiently obedient to entitle them to be called righteous… But there will be others who have been disobedient, and, therefore, deserving of punishment; of these, Jesus says 'They that have done evil (shall come forth) unto the resurrection of damnation'. Thus we see there are two classes comprised in this prediction about the resurrection.... This being so, how can this plain passage be reconciled with the theory which places the resurrection of the righteous at the beginning of the millennium, and the resurrection of the wicked at the end?... If further testimony be required from the mouth of Jesus, we cannot do better than refer to his description of the dividing of the sheep and goats. There can be no doubt that this takes place previous to the millennium, because the sheep are invited to enter the kingdom of the age to come, and the wicked are condemned to partake of the punishment preceding that age… The sentence pronounced upon this slothful servant is worded almost precisely the same as that against the unprofitable servant; and it shows, that at the second advent of the Master of God’s household punishment will be inflicted on those servants who have slumbered or are slumbering when he comes. In order that this may be done, those who have died must be raised from the dead, and the living must be brought before the judgment-seat… In the parable of the tares… ‘The tares,’ we are told, ‘are the children of the wicked one,’ – a phrase which comprises, not only unbelieving adversaries, but also all believers who are not faithful to their master; for Jesus says, ‘He that is not with me is against me’… we may conclude the burning of the tares immediately precedes the glories of the millennial age.” (JJ Andrew, The Ambassador, December, 1867)
"(Your correspondent) has evidently not perused the writings of Christadelphians carefully, or he would never have asserted that they believe in the resurrection of 'the whole family of man'...On the contrary they believe that only a portion of the human race will be raised from the dead-that portion which is responsible by a knowledge of God's truth" (JJ Andrew, The Christadelphian, Jan. 1871, p. 93).
"Daniel (Dan 12:2), in harmony with other prophets predicts that only some, or 'many of them that sleep... shall awake.' The 'many' will comprise all those who, by a knowledge of God's revealed truth, have been brought into a state of responsibility, from the time of Abel to the second appearing of Jesus Christ. To the faithful portion, styled by Daniel, 'the wise,' resurrection is all-important: it is the gate from the prison-house of the grave to eternal life: without it, they would like the heathen, become 'as though they had not been" (JJ Andrew, The Real Christ, pp. 174-175).
"Brother [JJ] Andrew reminds the Editor that writing on the same subject in The Herald Dr. Thomas says, 'We believe that the Scriptures teach the resurrection of the just and the unjust, who have died under times of knowledge, whose knowledge they have accepted; and the resurrection a thousand years afterwards of 'the rest of the dead' who have intelligently rejected it. The rest of the dead are those who never come under a constitution of righteousness; not because they did not know, but because they refused to do so. Having been enlightened, but preferring darkness to light, they will arise to judgment at the end of the millennium." (The Christadelphian 1870, p. 186— Vol. 5, No. 7, p. 161)"
... And Years Later..."Reference has been made to my change of attitude. Yes, a change from a position which I never deemed strong to one which I do deem strong" (JJ Andrew, Resurrectional Responsibility Debate, Opening Comments).
"It is further alleged that ‘first principles which have been established and settled for forty years are ‘recast’ and this is adduced as ‘proof that there is something unnatural in the argument’... A portion of the ‘first principles’ may be presented in a somewhat different light, but the only really new items are a violent death in relation to Edenic disobedience, and the doctrinal aspect of ‘the second death.’" (JJ. Andrew, The Sanctuary Keeper, July 1894, p. 13).
"Men cannot rise from the dead unless the Adamic sentence is taken away; the Adamic sentence is take away in the case of those who are baptized into Christ, and in the case of those under the Law who submitted to circumcision and sacrifice; and that, therefore, they can rise to judment because they are not under the Adam sentence" -- JJ Andrew's initial teaching in Blood of the Covenant paraphrased.